Home

Managing Attorney

Jonathan Roven

Plaintiff-side employment, personal injury, and workers’ compensation litigation. Licensed in California and Nevada.

Free consultation (818) 639-3997

Jonathan Roven, Managing Attorney at Workplace Rights Advocacy

About

Jonathan Roven is a Los Angeles native and Managing Attorney of Workplace Rights Advocacy (part of Jonny Law, PC). His practice focuses on personal injury, employment, and workers’ compensation litigation for workers and injured people— not employers. He is licensed in California and Nevada state and federal courts, including the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Eastern, and Northern Districts of California and the District of Nevada.

A Loyola Law School graduate and CALI Award recipient at Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law, Jonathan has been recognized as a Super Lawyers Rising Star and has secured notable appellate victories for clients, including successful outcomes in age and disability discrimination and workplace harassment cases. See notable decisions below and the firm’s full case results. He earned a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Davis.

Beyond the courtroom, Jonathan serves as President of the Los Angeles Jewish Bar Association and is active in several plaintiff-side legal associations, reflecting a commitment to advocacy both professionally and in the community.

Practice focus

Notable decisions

Selected appellate decisions from matters Jonathan litigated. Full firm outcomes—including verdicts and settlements—are on Case Results. For summaries of other published employment-law opinions nationwide, see Law Updates.

Hugelman v. Town of Mammoth Lakes — opinion (PDF) (2025)

The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment on most claims, holding triable issues of fact existed as to disability discrimination, age discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in the interactive process, and failure to prevent discrimination—while affirming only the dismissal of the retaliation claim. The court emphasized conflicts in the evidence regarding essential job duties, accommodation, and pretext that required resolution by a factfinder rather than on summary judgment.

Rivera v. FSC Corporation — opinion (PDF) (2024)

The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment in part, holding the trial court erred in dismissing the FEHA harassment and failure-to-prevent-harassment claims, as well as the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, because triable issues of fact existed. The court affirmed dismissal of the retaliation, assault/battery, and wage-and-hour claims and remanded for further proceedings on the surviving causes of action.

Wagner v. Homeowner Rights Law Group et al. — opinion (PDF) (2018)

The Court of Appeal affirmed denial of the defendants’ petition to compel arbitration, holding nonsignatory defendants were not bound by arbitration provisions and that equitable estoppel and agency theories did not apply. The court further held the trial court acted within its discretion under Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2(c) to avoid conflicting rulings by allowing the case to proceed in court. The matter was covered by MetNews.

Speaking, CLE & publications

Selected continuing legal education, professional presentations, and published articles.

When Workers’ Comp Meets Civil Court: Crossover Risks That Could Tank Your Case (2026)

Beverly Hills Bar Association · CLE OnDemand ·

Jonathan presented this Beverly Hills Bar Association CLE on the hidden risks where workers’ compensation and civil employment litigation overlap. Topics include how workers’ comp deposition strategies can create unintended exposure in civil cases, how civil defendants use workers’ comp discovery and awards to challenge civil claims—especially on disability—and how civil releases can be slipped into workers’ comp settlements. Available as BHBA OnDemand CLE (1.25 hours CA general credit).

Crossovers between employment law and workers’ compensation cases (2023)

Advocate Magazine · May 2023

Jonathan’s article for Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles’ Advocate magazine on how workers’ compensation claims can help—or harm—parallel civil employment cases. Topics include using WC discovery and medical evaluations in the civil forum, avoiding settlement releases and “voluntary resignation” language in Compromise and Release agreements that can wipe out civil claims, coordinating with applicant’s counsel, and defeating overstated workers’ compensation exclusivity / preemption arguments. Read the article.

Admissions & credentials

Contact the firm View case results