Negligent hiring
Recognized among the Top 100 Verdicts of 2018 in a heavily contested production-related injury case.
Managing Attorney
Jonathan Roven is a California employment lawyer and managing attorney at Workplace Rights Advocacy. Plaintiff-side employment, personal injury, and workers’ compensation litigation—wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wage claims. Licensed in California and Nevada. Speaks English and Spanish.
Jonathan Roven is a Los Angeles native and Managing Attorney of Workplace Rights Advocacy (part of Jonny Law, PC). His practice focuses on personal injury, employment, and workers’ compensation litigation for workers and injured people— not employers. He is licensed in California and Nevada state and federal courts, including the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Eastern, and Northern Districts of California and the District of Nevada.
A Loyola Law School graduate and CALI Award recipient (Torts I) at Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law, Jonathan earned a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Davis. He has been recognized by Super Lawyers and as a Super Lawyers Rising Star, and has secured notable appellate victories for clients in age and disability discrimination and workplace harassment matters. See published opinions below and the firm’s full case results.
Beyond the courtroom, Jonathan serves as President of the Los Angeles Jewish Bar Association and is active in plaintiff-side associations including CAALA, CELA, and CAAA. Outside work, he enjoys hiking with his wife and spending time with family— while still thinking about his clients’ cases.
Jonathan tries cases and takes contested matters through arbitration and administrative hearings—employment, personal injury, workers’ compensation, and related civil disputes. Recent years include employment and personal-injury jury trials, employment arbitrations, bench trials on wage claims, and workers’ compensation AOE/COE hearings.
The firm’s posture is litigation-first: cases are prepared as if they may be tried, which often drives pretrial settlements when defense exposure becomes clear. A year-by-year roster of trials, hearings, and arbitrations is published on Case Results — Trials, hearings & arbitration.
Prior results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Some recoveries are summarized subject to confidentiality.
Selected highlights from matters Jonathan has litigated. The complete ordered list—including additional employment, personal-injury, and related outcomes—is on Case Results.
Negligent hiring
Recognized among the Top 100 Verdicts of 2018 in a heavily contested production-related injury case.
Wrongful termination
Contested termination and related employment claims resolved for $1,250,000 (details omitted where confidential).
Race harassment / wrongful termination
Race-harassment and wrongful-termination claims following racial epithets at work and termination after complaint.
Wrongful termination / wage complaints
Client terminated after complaining about wage-and-hour violations; judgment exceeding $900,000.
Disability discrimination / wrongful termination
Long-tenured employee terminated after a serious injury under an alleged “policy” pretext.
Sexual harassment / wrongful termination
Supervisor harassment followed by termination after complaint; settled within months of filing.
Selected Court of Appeal decisions from matters Jonathan litigated. For summaries of other employment-law opinions (not the firm’s cases), see Law Updates.
The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment on most claims, holding triable issues of fact existed as to disability discrimination, age discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in the interactive process, and failure to prevent discrimination—while affirming only the dismissal of the retaliation claim. The court emphasized conflicts in the evidence regarding essential job duties, accommodation, and pretext that required resolution by a factfinder rather than on summary judgment.
The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment in part, holding the trial court erred in dismissing the FEHA harassment and failure-to-prevent-harassment claims, as well as the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, because triable issues of fact existed. The court affirmed dismissal of the retaliation, assault/battery, and wage-and-hour claims and remanded for further proceedings on the surviving causes of action.
The Court of Appeal affirmed denial of the defendants’ petition to compel arbitration, holding nonsignatory defendants were not bound by arbitration provisions and that equitable estoppel and agency theories did not apply. The court further held the trial court acted within its discretion under Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2(c) to avoid conflicting rulings by allowing the case to proceed in court. Covered by Metropolitan News-Enterprise.
Continuing legal education and professional presentations for plaintiff-side and crossover practice audiences.
Jonathan presented this Beverly Hills Bar Association CLE on the hidden risks where workers’ compensation and civil employment litigation overlap—including deposition strategy, how civil defendants use WC discovery and awards (especially on disability), and civil releases slipped into workers’ comp settlements. Available as BHBA OnDemand CLE (1.25 hours CA general credit). Speaker profile: BHBA Guest Speaker.
Award methodologies are controlled by the awarding organizations. Inclusion does not guarantee results in any matter.
Employment and injury matters are often confidential. We do not publish attributed client quotes on this site without clear written permission, and many settlements include non-disparagement or confidentiality terms that limit what can be said publicly.
Prospective clients evaluating fit should review documented case results, appellate opinions, and trial experience, then speak with us directly about references where appropriate. You can also leave a review after your matter concludes through the platforms where you found the firm.
Answers we give on every page before you call. More detail is on our full FAQ page.