Firm Home · Practice areas · Employment Discrimination · San Jose
Employment Discrimination Lawyer in San Jose
Employee-side discrimination counsel for workers in San Jose and nearby California workplaces.
How we help San Jose workers
Workplace Rights Advocacy represents San Jose employees in discrimination matters and related California claims. San Jose and South Bay workplaces—tech, manufacturing, and services—see misclassification, retaliation, and discrimination disputes that still turn on California statutes and evidence.
Discrimination is not about whether your boss was merely unfair—it is about whether you were treated worse in hiring, pay, promotions, discipline, or firing because of who you are (or who your employer thought you were). Few employers announce bias openly, so these cases often rely on timing, inconsistent explanations, comments, and comparator evidence.
Protected characteristics under FEHA
California’s FEHA covers a broad set of protected traits—including race, sex, gender, pregnancy, disability, age (40+), religion, national origin, sexual orientation, and others. Subpages address disability, race, gender, age, pregnancy, and more.
Evidence that often matters
- Biased remarks or stereotypes in meetings or messages
- Uneven discipline or promotion patterns
- Shifting reasons for an adverse decision
- Replacement by someone outside your protected group
- Retaliation after you opposed discrimination
Frequently asked questions
- Is unfair treatment the same as discrimination?
- No. Discrimination requires a link to protected status (or association/perception). Unfairness alone is not enough under FEHA.
- What if my employer cites “performance”?
- Performance can be a legitimate reason—or pretext. Prior reviews, sudden PIPs after a complaint, and comparator treatment help sort which.
- Can I bring both discrimination and retaliation?
- Yes, when the facts support both. Retaliation can stand even if the underlying discrimination claim is disputed.
- Do I need a “smoking gun” email?
- Helpful but not required. Circumstantial evidence—timing, comments, patterns—wins many cases.