Smith v. Superior Court of Alameda County

California Court of Appeal, First District · 2026 · Published opinion

Summary for general education only—not legal advice. This is not a Workplace Rights Advocacy case result. See Case Results for the firm’s own verdicts and settlements.

A published California Court of Appeal decision about FEHA race discrimination and harassment claims—and when many workers can join together in one lawsuit. After a related class action against Tesla was decertified, about 440 former class members sued in five multi-plaintiff complaints alleging racial harassment at a single Tesla factory. The Alameda County Superior Court found misjoinder and ordered every plaintiff except the first-named person in each complaint to be dismissed and to file a separate individual lawsuit.

The Court of Appeal granted writ relief and vacated that order. At the pleading stage, allegations that Tesla knew about ongoing racist conduct and engaged in a pattern and practice of ignoring it were enough to show a common series of transactions under California’s permissive joinder statute (Code of Civil Procedure § 378)—even if workers experienced harassment at different times or places inside the same factory. What matters is commonality of liability that can be handled as a mass action, not identical damages or identical day-to-day experiences.

In plain English: when workers allege the same workplace-wide failure to stop racial harassment, California law generally lets them decide to sue together. Trial courts can later order separate trials for case-management reasons, but they cannot strike properly joined claims or force everyone into individual complaints just because the case looks hard to manage or because filing fees might be lower for the court. The published opinion is an important procedural win for multi-plaintiff FEHA harassment litigation.

← All law updates