Firm Home · Legal Resources · Law Updates

Adelanto Elementary School District v. Krause

California Court of Appeal, Fourth District · 2026 · Published opinion

Summary for general education only—not legal advice. This is not a Workplace Rights Advocacy case result. See Case Results for the firm’s own verdicts and settlements.

A published California Court of Appeal decision about workplace violence restraining orders (WVROs) under Code of Civil Procedure § 527.8. Adelanto Elementary School District sought a WVRO to protect three executive assistants from its former superintendent, Michael Krause, after he was later elected to the school board. The trial court issued a four-year order. Krause argued a separation agreement releasing claims against him barred the petition.

The Court of Appeal affirmed as modified. As a matter of first impression, an employer’s right to seek a WVRO on behalf of its employees is unwaivable—like core FEHA rights— because the statute serves a public interest in workplaces free from violence, threats, and harassment. A release in a separation agreement therefore could not strip the district of that tool. The court also held that, under the expanded 2025 statute, the “future harm” showing can be met by a reasonable probability of continued harassment, not only future violence. It upheld the order on that record, but vacated an overbroad provision that banned Krause from commenting on the WVRO at board meetings in violation of the First Amendment.

In plain English: California law treats protecting workers from workplace harassment and violence as a public safety interest, not a private perk an employer can sign away. Even after someone leaves (or lands back in a position of power), employers may still ask courts for restraining-order protection when the evidence supports a real risk of continued harassment. Workers should know that settlements and separation papers do not erase that protective pathway.

More law updates: Smith v. Superior Court · Decloedt v. Radnet · Flowers Foods v. Brock

← All law updates

Common questions

Answers we give on every page before you call. More detail is on our full FAQ page.

Do I have a case?

If you faced discrimination, harassment, retaliation, unpaid wages, wrongful termination, leave denial, or a refused disability accommodation, you may have claims. Whether your facts support a case depends on the evidence, deadlines, and applicable law—we evaluate that in consultation.

How much does it cost?

Initial consultations are typically free. If we take the matter, fees are usually explained in a written agreement before you hire us. Many employment cases are handled on contingency (see below).

Do you work on contingency?

In many employment matters, yes—attorney fees may be collected only if there is a recovery, subject to a signed fee agreement. Costs and fee arrangements can vary by case type; we confirm the terms up front.

How long will my case take?

Some matters resolve in months; contested lawsuits can take a year or longer through discovery, mediation, arbitration, or trial. Timing depends on the claims, court or arbitrator calendars, and whether the other side fights. See how long employment lawsuits take.

What should I bring?

Bring or upload what you have: a short timeline, pay stubs or time records, emails and texts, write-ups or reviews, medical or leave paperwork, and the names of witnesses or managers. See our documentation guide.

Free consultation?

Yes—initial consultations are typically free and confidential. Contacting us does not create an attorney–client relationship until there is a signed written agreement.

What happens after I contact you?

Our intake team reviews what you send, follows up if we need more detail, and screens deadlines and claim types. If the matter may be a fit, we schedule a consultation to discuss options, risks, and next steps—or we let you know promptly if we cannot help.